
Roy Beck, Founder
& CEO, NumbersUSA
|
NumbersUSA's Roy Beck
Assesses Presidential Candidates On Immigration Issues |
|
|
Click here to see the most recent delegate count totals for DEMOCRAT candidates
|
Click here to see the most recent delegate count totals for REPUBLICAN candidates |
Click on candidate's name for more information.
As of |
|
| Click name or image at right for detailed immigration & contact information |
DEMOCRATS |
REPUBLICANS |
3rd Party |
LIBERTARIAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessing Overall Candidate Promises (See criteria below) |
No amnesty — Attrition through enforcement pushes illegal aliens back home |
abysmal |
abysmal |
|
|
To be determined |
To be determined |
Stop future illegal
immigration |
poor |
poor |
fair |
good |
|
|
Reduce legal
immigration — Protect Americans from mass foreign worker competitions, congestion & sprawl |
abysmal |
abysmal |
abysmal |
poor |
|
|
Assessment of Past Immigration Actions in Political Office |
| Based on Congressional, Gubernatorial and Mayoral actions |
bad |
bad |
abysmal |
good |
To be determined |
To be determined |
Assessing Specific Legal Immigration Stances (See criteria below) |
| |
Obama |
Clinton |
McCain |
Paul |
Nader |
Gravel |
| End chain migration |
|
|
|
|
To be determined |
To be determined |
| End visa Lottery |
poor |
poor |
bad |
good |
|
|
Control foreign
worker numbers / protect U.S. workers |
abysmal |
abysmal |
abysmal |
good |
|
|
| No citizenship for births to illegal aliens |
poor |
poor |
poor |
excellent |
|
|
Assessing Specific ILLEGAL Immigration Stances (See criteria below) |
| |
Obama |
Clinton |
McCain |
Paul |
Nader |
Gravel |
| Mandatory workplace verification |
bad |
bad |
good |
|
To be determined |
To be determined |
| Punish employers who hire illegal aliens |
good |
good |
fair |
poor |
|
|
| Local enforcement of federal immigration laws |
bad |
fair |
good |
good |
|
|
| Implement entry-exit system |
poor |
bad |
fair |
good |
|
|
| More security at borders |
fair |
fair |
good |
good |
|
|
| End sanctuary cities |
bad |
poor |
fair |
good |
|
|
| Prohibit states from issuing driver's licenses to illegal aliens |
abysmal |
fair |
poor |
poor |
|
|
| Prohibit in-state tuition to illegal aliens |
abysmal |
bad |
abysmal |
fair |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOURCES & EXPLANATIONS
ASSESSMENTS CHANGE WITH THE CANDIDATES: The NumbersUSA staff updates the candidate information pages every day. NumbersUSA Founder and CEO Roy Beck looks at those updates and adjusts his grading of the candidates based on the newest information of changes in candidate comments.
ROY BECK’S CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING: “I look at these candidates ONLY in terms of what they have done about immigration and what they are promising to do on the issue.
“I grade all these candidates on how well they promise to carry out the recommendations of two national commissions in the 1990s and on other widely accepted goals for reducing overall illegal and legal immigration.
“I know that citizens choose to support a candidate based on many issues and on character and on past experience. I don’t endorse candidates because I don’t consider all those other aspects of the whole candidate. But I do candidly assess how each of them stacks up on immigration issues.
“I give the most weight to an official statement of promises, unless the candidate has said or done something since stating the policy to cast doubt on the promise.
“Absent an official policy, I give considerable weight to recent public statements. I leave room for candidates to shift positions; I don’t forever label them based on past statements or actions. The point here is what a candidate is most likely to do in the future as President, not grade them on past performances. But when current statements are ambiguous, contradictory, less than enthusiastically embraced or non-existent, I use past actions to help assess.
"If a candidate has said or done something new that calls into question a rating in a category, we will place black question marks (? ? ? ?) until we have sorted out where the rating should be."
If a candidate has taken no stand and made no statements about one of the issues on the grid, I give a "poor" rating because the candidate has failed to respond in any way to a crucial aspect of the immigration problem.
Most of the campaigns have contacted us at NumbersUSA to contest one or more ratings, and to ask how they can get better ratings. Staffers of a number of campaigns have sought to assure us that their candidate is really better than he/she appears in public on a particular issue. We appreciate the information from the staffers, but until a stance shows up on the official website or in comments made in public by the candidates themselves, we won't change the rating.
“If you don’t like my assessment of a candidate because you think I have used faulty information, contact us with your information. If you want your favorite candidate to get a better assessment from me, work to get that candidate to make better, more convincing promises on immigration.”
Add our banners to your website or email.
Help support True Immigration-Reform Candidates.
CLICK HERE to learn how.
|